A contract found to have undue influence is considered what?

When a contract is found to have undue influence, it is considered voidable. Undue influence occurs when one party to a contract takes advantage of their position of power over another party, leading to an agreement that is not made freely and willingly.

In such cases, the party that has been influenced can choose to either affirm the contract or void it. By declaring the contract voidable, the law recognizes that the influenced party had their autonomy compromised and allows them the option to escape the obligations of the contract. This legal framework aims to protect vulnerable individuals from exploitation in contractual agreements.

In contrast, a contract that is enforceable would imply that it stands as valid and can be legally upheld, which is not the case when undue influence is present. An invalid contract would imply that it cannot be enforced at all due to fundamental issues, while a legally binding contract would suggest that both parties are obligated to adhere to its terms, which contradicts the nature of one party being unduly influenced.