An inebriated (intoxicated) person enters into a contract. The contract is?

In this scenario, when an inebriated person enters into a contract, the contract is considered voidable. This means that the intoxicated individual has the option to affirm or reject the contract once they regain their faculties. The rationale behind this is grounded in the legal principle that a person must have the capacity to comprehend the nature and consequences of the agreement they are entering into.

The law recognizes that intoxication can impair a person's ability to make decisions, thereby affecting their understanding of the contractual obligations. As a result, while the contract is not automatically null and void at the moment of intoxication, it grants the intoxicated party the right to take action to void the contract later if they choose to do so.

In contrast, contracts that are classified as null are inherently invalid from the beginning, meaning they have no legal effect regardless of the parties' mental capacity. Enforceability indicates a valid contract that can be upheld in a court, which wouldn’t apply here due to the impairment. Lastly, categorizing a contract as criminal implies that it involves illegal activities, which does not pertain to the intoxication aspect of contract law in this context. The principle of voidability serves to protect individuals who may not be in a position to fully understand the