An intentional statement of false facts upon which an injured party relied in decision to enter into a contract, to their detriment is?

The scenario described fits the definition of fraud, which involves an intentional misrepresentation of material facts that a party relies upon to their detriment, typically in a contractual context. When someone engages in fraud, they deliberately present false information with the intent to deceive another party, leading that party to make a decision—often to enter into a contract—that ultimately results in harm or a disadvantage to them.

Fraud is a serious offense often recognized both legally and ethically, and it can have substantial consequences for the party committing the fraudulent act, including potential legal repercussions. In the context of contract law, establishing that fraud occurred can provide grounds for the injured party to seek rescission of the contract or damages resulting from the deceit.

While deceit and misrepresentation are related concepts, they do not fully encapsulate the intentional and damaging nature of the act described in the question. Deceit can sometimes imply a broader scope of dishonest behavior, whereas misrepresentation generally refers to false statements that may or may not involve intent to deceive. Negligence, on the other hand, pertains to unintentional failure to act with reasonable care, which is not applicable in this instance.