Generally, a minor is fully liable for which of the following?

Minors typically have limited legal capacity and are generally not held fully liable for their contractual obligations. However, when it comes to torts, minors can indeed be held fully liable for their actions. This means that if a minor engages in wrongful or negligent behavior resulting in harm or damage to another person or their property, they can be responsible for those actions to the same extent as an adult would be, taking into account any relevant nuances of the law in their jurisdiction.

The reasoning behind this principle is that individuals must be held accountable for their actions, regardless of age, especially when it involves causing harm or injury. While minors are afforded certain protections in contract law to prevent them from being taken advantage of, tort law operates differently. Thus, when a minor commits a tort, they can be liable for damages, making them fully accountable in these situations.

In contrast, contracts and agency usually involve considerations of legal capacity, wherein minors can void contracts and typically cannot act as agents due to their age. Novations, involving the replacement of one contract party with another, also do not imply full liability on the part of minors.