If a minor chooses to treat a contract as binding, what is the status of the adult's ability to avoid it?

The correct answer reflects the legal principle that protects minors in contractual agreements. Generally, contracts entered into by minors are voidable at the minor's discretion, allowing them the ability to choose whether or not they wish to be bound by the terms of the contract. This principle exists to protect minors, who may not fully understand their rights and obligations under such agreements due to their age and level of maturity.

When a minor opts to treat a contract as binding, the adult party to the contract maintains the right to avoid the contract simply based on the minor's status. This means the adult cannot enforce the contract against the minor, recognizing the imbalance of power and understanding that exists in such agreements. This legal protection ensures that adults cannot exploit minors or hold them to agreements that they may not fully comprehend or be ready to honor.

The other choices present scenarios that do not accurately reflect the fundamental legal protections granted to minors in contract law. For instance, stating that the adult cannot avoid the contract under any circumstances fails to take into account the minor's legal standing. Additionally, the idea that the adult can only avoid it if the contract is proven to be harmful contradicts the straightforward principle of a minor's capacity to void contracts independent of harm. Lastly, asserting that the adult