Under which condition are contracts made by intoxicated individuals considered void?

Contracts made by intoxicated individuals are considered void when the intoxication prevents the individual from understanding the nature and consequences of their actions. This means that if a person is so impaired by alcohol or drugs that they cannot comprehend what they are agreeing to, any contract they enter into may be deemed invalid. This principle is based on the idea that a fundamental element of a valid contract is the ability of all parties to fully understand the terms and implications of their agreement.

In this context, if the intoxicated individual cannot grasp the terms or the significance of the contract, it undermines the contract's validity. As such, the law seeks to protect individuals from being held accountable for agreements they were incapable of understanding due to their impaired state. This serves as a safeguard against exploitation and ensures that all parties enter into contracts with a clear mind and full awareness of their commitments.

The other conditions mentioned, such as situations where the individual is able to make sound decisions, do not provide a basis for voiding a contract, as the capacity to make sound decisions contradicts the very premise of intoxication affecting understanding. Additionally, contracts made under the influence of legal substances could still be valid unless there is clear proof of incapacity to understand, which ties back to the understanding