What describes a contract made by a person who is intoxicated but aware of their actions?

A contract made by a person who is intoxicated but still aware of their actions is considered valid. For a contract to be valid, the parties involved must have the capacity to enter into the agreement. Intoxication does not automatically void a contract; it depends on the individual's level of intoxication and their ability to understand the nature and consequences of their actions at the time the contract was made. If the person can demonstrate that they were aware of their actions and had a reasonable understanding of what they were agreeing to, the contract holds legal validity.

In contrast, a void contract would indicate that there is no legal effect, often due to a lack of capacity—such as when a person is severely intoxicated. Reckless and questionable do not align directly with the legal definitions relevant to contracts; these terms do not accurately capture the legal standing of the agreement under such circumstances. Therefore, the correct answer reflects an understanding of the necessary conditions for a valid contract, despite one party being intoxicated.