What must a party to a contract demonstrate if they claim it is voidable?

A party claiming that a contract is voidable must demonstrate circumstances such as insanity or intoxication that affect their ability to understand the nature of the agreement or to make rational decisions. This means that due to these impaired mental states, the individual may not have had the capacity to provide informed consent to the terms of the contract.

In contract law, a voidable contract is valid until one party chooses to affirm or void it. Situations involving mental incapacity, such as being under the influence of drugs or alcohol or suffering from a mental illness, provide grounds for a party to assert that they did not have the capacity to enter into the contract, and thus, it may be voidable at their discretion.

The other options do not adequately address the specific requirement needed to claim a contract as voidable. Mutual agreement indicates that both parties have agreed to the terms, which is typically necessary for any enforceable contract but does not relate to voidability. Intent to deceive relates more to fraud, impacting the enforceability of a contract rather than its voidability. Written documentation is important for certain contracts under the Statute of Frauds but is not a condition for a claim of voidability. Therefore, demonstrating insanity or intoxication is key in asserting that a contract