Which of the following describes a promise made under duress in a contract?

A promise made under duress in a contract is considered voidable because it reflects an agreement that was obtained through coercion or pressure. Duress implies that one party was forced into making a promise or entering into an agreement against their will, often through threats or unlawful acts.

When a contract is voidable, it means that the party who was under duress has the right to affirm or reject the contract. This aspect acknowledges that the consent given by the victim of duress was not truly voluntary, granting them an option to rescind the contract once they feel safe or no longer under pressure.

In contrast, a valid contract is one that is legally enforceable and meets all necessary legal requirements, while a void contract is one that has no legal effect from the beginning. An enforceable contract, on the other hand, is one that can be upheld in a court of law. However, because the promise was made under duress, it lacks the necessary voluntary consent to be considered valid or enforceable without the option of rescission. Thus, the correct characterization of such a promise is that it is voidable.